As a part of the film,
The Mad Divide, I set out to find why there is a divide in politics in the country and where the divide is rooted. What I found out completely blew me away, and I never realized that the divide is irrelevant, until I started interviewing the activists in the different activist communities. It hit me like a ton of bricks. I realized, people don't know the truth. The media is literally keeping it from you, to control you.
The goal of the film project is to show the left/right paradigm and how it's used against the people. It will explore how civility and rational discussion was a common practice in the town square. Open debates were common and people had a respect for the proper etiquette of dialogue. After slowly introducing name calling, card stacking and other propaganda techniques, the society and even the individual has been broken down, socially engineered to fight like an animal.
This film introduces people to the activists that attempt to push for real change and the battle they face.
This film is not about Obama bashing. Every single presidency, there seems to be an abundance of documentaries that are exposing the corruption and lies of the administration presiding over that period. There was Clinton Chronicles, among many others, during Clinton's reign. There was "The Best Democracy Money Can Buy," and "Uncounted," and "Bush's Brain," and about a thousands other ones during George W Bush's presidency, and now there is "The Obama Deception," and "Fall of the Republic." I am sick and tired of seeing films that only address to half the story and half the problem. It makes it next to impossible to get people stuck in the left/right paradigm to wake up to what you are trying to discuss if the only available films out there are presented with a bias either center left or center right. It is time for a film to address both parties, and span multiple generations of presidents. It is time for a film to show the big picture. It is time for a film to present the case for the left/right paradigm and show how there are more than just similarities between the establishment democrats and the establishment republicans. There are plenty of differences on the local level of politics, where it may be socially acceptable to have some of these cultural paradigms. On a national level, however, where we all come together as a nation of diversity attempting to find a representative for all of us, deciding that representative on local politics and social norms for your personal lifestyle is really not what the Federal politics was setup for, at least for the most part. A lot of this depends on your philosophy of government and the separation of powers that the constitutional creators intended.
What is interesting is that when you start to pay close attention to certain aspects of the presidential policies in terms of regulations on Wall Street, policy with lobbyists, whistle-blower cases, transparency with media, the war, the diplomatic structure, and many others, you will find that there is virtually no difference between the parties. In fact, when it comes to corporate policy and think tank advisory, the Republicans and Democrats are almost completely the exact same. So why is it that people don't realize this? Perhaps because there is hundreds of millions of dollars spent on Public Relations firms during the campaign to make sure people do not pay attention to these things since they will never change. Also, the people seem to be together as a majority about how they want to deal with or respond to these areas of policy, which is something you might not expect. In fact, the people are so together on a lot of these issues that the Republicans and Democrats are not even electable based on these fundamentals. So there is a very serious effort on the part of campaign advisers and public relations specialists to make sure that the politicians discuss socially divided issues like abortion. These issues the politicians know you are not together on as a society so they know people will naturally divide.
It is the old game of divide and conquer just mixed in with the magician's slide of hand distraction tactics as well. Think about it. The politicians know we are all together on the policy related to the war, Wall Street, corporate regulations, whistle-blower cases, etc, etc, etc, so by getting everyone divided and focuses on abortion or some other social political paradigm, the people will divide into groups and fight. This in turn creates misdirection and the campaign can then be controlled. See, all the same corporations and lobbyists fund both sides of the election and all the think tanks and banks get the same guys in the administration no matter who wins. The cabinet is always made up of the insiders that never change, for the most part, so it is a major benefit for the politicians to get the people divided as soon as possible with as many issues as possible. The only thing is, the United States of America has something called the separation of powers, which is a philosophical government construct where politics is separated on local, state and federal matters. The whole idea of that structure was because the United States was founded on the idea of liberty, so it was NOT ever supposed to be a place where people dictate a way of life, they protect everyone's way of life so long as it doesn't get forced on others against their will. The idea is simple, really. All the land owners in an area get together and form a town or municipality, and they decided the laws for that area, since they are the land owners and therefore they are the sovereign controllers of how they dictate what is legal and what is illegal. For the most part, the purpose of the separation of powers was to protect everyone's different ways of life so that when you travel around the United States, you may enter in one town that has laws against certain practices or language or behaviors and you can experience the true diversity of a democratic-republic.
That is what America is called, by definition. A democratic-republic. It is not quite a democracy and it is not quite a republic, with the separation of powers you act democratically on a local level, where 50% or more of the vote decides the local and state interpretations of law, which is more of a democratic concept, while you still elect representative to make decisions for you, which is more of a republic concept. It is really neat when you think about it.
"The world is not dangerous because of those who do harm but because of those who look at it without doing anything." -Albert Einstein
The thing that astonishes me the most about America is that we consistently blame one person for all of our problems and then when that person is gone we elect a new one to blame. Nothing ever gets better because we never hold the right people accountable. What I am largely referring to here are the administrative positions of the white house and all the lobbyists or think tanks as well as the multinational corporations who write policy or manipulate policy.
These are not "elected" people, even the cabinet positions. The cabinet positions are decided by the people who gave the money to the president when they were campaigning, that's what we know now from the insiders. They all admit it happens, that the president chooses the heads of the various departments based on the suggestions given to them from the people who financed their campaigns. So I guess that is one of the ways that string-pullers don't need to run for office to write policy, they just get one of their own into office. Why bribe people when you can actually become an politicians and get what you want? That is the new thing these days.
Secure your copy of "The Mad Divide" today and help make my effort to become a jouranlist full time a reality and replace the establishment cronies lying to you. http://coreofcorruption.net/product_info.php?cPath=3&products_id=46
There are so many documented events where a corporation(s), think tank(s) or lobbyist(s) have manipulated a public official or government office for their own interestts. There are just as many examples where a politician has come from the corporate environment that they may be involved with regulating as a government official. Like when a defense contractor becomes defense secretary and then coordinates the military contracts to go to the contracting firm they just worked for or currently hold stock in. Did anyone see when Monsanto CEO became head of the department of agriculture and coordinated laws that require the purchasing of seeds or pesticides from the company they worked or work for or hold stocks in. How about when Halliburton's Dick Cheney decided that Halliburton got all those no-bid contracts? That is what is supposed to be great about America, right?
Capitalism is supposed to encourage competitiveness in the market and get people to bid each other for better jobs and technology because there is always a motive and they keep finding better quality products or more efficient designs or cheaper alternatives and so on. But what about no-bid contracts? You mean to tell me that the government gives the work to a company and no one else is allowed to offer a better price or a better product? That is not going to create competitiveness, that is just an insult to "free market capitalism" and is a corrupt form of corporatism.
How about when lobbyists don't just advise politicians on policy, but bribe them for agendas. Or when think tanks don't just recommend or write pieces on social change, they actually formulate policy that is written and passed into law. Do you realize there are admissions in biographies out there where people admit they were literally handed policy from a think tank they were apart of or some advising firm and then they passed it into law? Why am I voting again? A representative is supposed to represent the people of their district or state or nation, but when this stuff happens, it defeats the whole point of asking me to vote. Why bother asking my opinion if these guys are just going to do this, I feel insulted when they ask my opinion, its such a joke.
"It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society." -Krishnamurti
SO what happened? Well, corporations, lobbyists, think tanks, establishment families and big banks all started to co-opt this system and start to control the debates, only allowing Republicans and Democrats to debates and even restricting other parties from being on ballots. The idea of controlling both parties is great to them because the only difference between the 2 parties is domestic interpretation of the law, while Republican and Democratic policies on a foreign or international level never change. They also never change in regard to regulations and corporations, and they rarely ever change in regards to Wall Street. In fact, most of the cabinet heads in each presidential administration keep things pretty much the same, depending on how you look at it. Instead of corporations bribing politicians, which still goes on anyways, they just run for office now. IN fact, corporations just finance a campaign and tell the winner of the election to pick their own people for cabinets. IT is much more efficient to a corporation to literally have their own people in government, rather than mess with the controversy of "advising" or bribing the leaders. Kind of tricky, isn't it?
Well the problem is, it got so bad, that now there is virtually no difference between the parties and the only way they can get away with this is by making sure that every 4 years, they hype of the president and they hype up social paradigms that divide us so that it creates the illusion that "change" can be brought to Washington. The truth is, very little changes, in fact, there is a common agenda and there has been for a long time. IN short, that agenda is basically a common interest, sometimes written, to centralize power, cease geo-political interests globally, combine wealth and take more control. The age old quest for global order and the age old theme of greed combine to make what we see today. It is not a system where the representatives you pick are representing you at all. Politicians represent their constituents who paid for their campaigns and the politicians represent the big banks, multi-national corporations and lobbyists while picking "advisers" from these elitist "think tanks" that practically write policy. You pretty much are a nobody and you have no influence. In fact, for the most part, the majority of the people don't have a say in anything any more, but they are given the illusion that they have choice and they are given the illusion that there are diverse issues between the parties by focusing on these locally related political paradigms that don't concern the Federal government. If we all get together to pick representatives on a local level, social constructs and ways of life make sense, but if we all get together as a nation to pick a common representative, like a president, well we certainly don't have our specific practice of liberty in common, we are too diverse as a nation. The only thing we have in common is that we are all Americans and that we all pay taxes. The president's job has very little to do with social constructs, so why are we deciding a president on that concept? Isn't that what the local representatives are for?
See the whole point now? The whole idea of the left/right paradigm is a construct that has been co-opted and used for misdirection and divide and conquer on a scale we have never seen before. The elections are so state of the art with the public relations now that fireworks and extravagant shows are conducted alongside incredible powerful propaganda of waving flags and moving speeches that have very little actual specificity or direction. Smiles everywhere for the cameras snapping thousands of pictures with flashes all over stadiums. Musicians, actors, performers of all kinds and just general celebrities fill red carpet events as politics has been turned into pop culture right before our very eyes. The application of public relations 2.0, a level of PR we have never seen is being conducted. You have no idea that you are being mislead and you are being molded, shaped to believe that there is diversity and that there are only 2 ways of deciding policy. Like yes or no, or good and evil. Policy is so complex that there are literally thousands of ways to write it, but you have been intentionally mislead to think that there are only 2 ways to do anything. The left or the right are the only options. Every effort imaginable is employed, including some of the most advanced psychological warfare tactics to try and convince you that your vote is not actually a vote if you do not vote for these 2 parties. Hitler couldn't even have dreamed of accomplishing this level of propaganda where the sheep are literally acting as their own sheep herders, barking at others to stay in line and vote establishment every time.
The social stereotypes of the left and right keep people in a false belief that there are these religious people on the right, even though countless Republicans are gnostic or atheist, according to many of their biographies. They literally say what they need to say to get the support and votes. Fundamental Christianity is a common stereotype for the "right" in America, and they tend to be adamantly anti-gay in their policies but there are more cases of homosexuality among Neo-conservative men who are openly fundamental Christians than any other demographic in politics. Another social construct given to you is the false idea that Republicans are "fiscally conservative." The largest debts can be attributed to Neo-conservative campaigns. The "small government" ideology of the right is certainly not in the Republican administrations of Reagan or Bush W, who claimed to be small government. The government literally tripled in size during George W's campaign. Under Nixon, the "war on drugs" was launched and it continued with expansion under Reagan while it was his administration that was in power when Iran-Contra hearings uncovered that the majority of cocaine being brought into the US was under CIA protection since the Contras had no other form of payment. The CIA literally protected drug shipments and even was investigated for running Cocaine themselves, which is nothing new.
The attacks on civil liberties are not just something Democratic administrations have done, since Republicans want to point that out.
And what about the social stereotypes of Democrats? How about the "anti-corporate" stereotype. It is a corporate party with some of the largest corporations in the world backing it and controlling its most influential seats. Hillary Clinton sat on the board of directors for the legal team of Wal Mart. Wal Mart started in Arkansas and when Clinton was governor there, Hillary made a lot of major connections with the multi-national giant before it was even legal to become the multi-national giant. It was during Clinton's administration that NAFTA was expanded and the World Trade Organization was created, and heavily protested by the leftist communities. The WTO literally paved the way for the outsourcing the gave birth to Wal-Mart and started to destroy the American economy, at least its internal economic infrastructure.
And Democrats are supposed to be liberal, but it has been Obama's administration that continued every single attack on our liberties that Bush initiated after 9/11. Don't believe me, read this article I wrote about this where I cite some of the most reputable sources to prove nothing changed when Obama got in office, in fact, one might argue it got worse.
"The slogans of Newspeak are, War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery, and Ignorance is Strength." -George Orwell
I think you get my point. It is obvious that the social construct given to us is false. Every single stereotype you use to justify your support for these two parties they control is just not true. The Republicans and Democrats do NOT represent the people, they don't on a Federal level at least. Period. So why do we continue to vote for them. Look, if they are going to win anyway, and I can prove to you they throw elections and have for years, then why roll over on command? Why be pushed around? Why conform and let these establishment cronies get one over on ya. They already work you to death and steal all your hard earned money. They already screw you day in and day out, so why be their cheerleaders?
I don't care if I am the only person that votes a 3rd party, you asked for my vote, I gave it. Enough is enough of the propaganda that they paid millions of dollars for you to eat up and spit back out saying things like "oh well those votes don't count." Really? NONE OF THE VOTES COUNT. They RIGGED THE WHOLE SYSTEM. The parties are the same, period. Don't say any more of this non sense of "well if I don't vote for this guy then the other party will win. THEY ALWAYS WIN, GET IT!? Both Parties are the same. They want you to think that when Republicans or Democrats are in office, that things are different. They aren't. They never have been. And there is no such thing as "throwing away your vote." If you want to throw your vote away, then vote Republican or Democrat, because you might as well just say it out loud that you like to be pushed over by bullies and people with more money than you . They love it when you go out there and bark at people for voting their conscious. The establishment LOVES IT when you go around acting as their little cheerleaders.
What I am saying here is pull yourself together. Realize this right now, realize one thing. It doesn't matter if you vote Republican or Democrat. They ALWAYS win, no matter who is in office, and they will always get "their guy" in office and that means they will get even more of "their guys" in the administration. Voting 3rd party is not just about voting your conscious, its about voting with intelligence. Its about a protest vote. It is because you no better that you vote 3rd party. It is because you realize things are never going to change with these 2 parties that you vote 3rd party. There isn't any reason to not vote 3rd party, all the reasons they have handed you by their well paid public relations experts don't make any sense. They are logically invalid. Like "throwing away your vote." Throwing away your vote would be to keep the establishment parties in office. Period.
Do the right thing, do the intelligent thing. Don't be a pushover. Stand up for yourself once in a while and vote who you want. Don't be scared to vote for who you want, they asked you, now tell them who you want. Don't be scared. They want you to be scared. They want you to start telling yourself things and convincing yourself of the propaganda. They want you to manipulate your own mind, because that's how they win. They love that they don't have to try very hard because most people coward and talk to themselves, telling themselves to do things they don't want to do. That is how you know propaganda is in place. It is clear as day.
It is time for people to start realizing there will never be any change, until you start to drop your support for the Republicans and Democrats on the Federal level. Get the lobbyists, think tanks, CEO's and banks out of office. It is time to get some of our own people in there. Otherwise it just isn't worth it. If you can't get your people in there, the people you want, then maybe it is time for something else.
Secure your copy of "The Mad Divide" today and help make my effort to become a jouranlist full time a reality and replace the establishment cronies lying to you. http://coreofcorruption.net/product_info.php?cPath=3&products_id=46
Here are the truths about the left and right you won't hear right now -
As for the Democrats in our society, it is time for people to review exactly what has happend since Obama took office and where we are to understand the full scope of the lies we were told. Here is an article I wrote to address this exact issue:
http://www.newworldorderreport.com/News/tabid/266/ID/7352/Obama-to-receive-award-for-being-so-open-to-the-press-The-award-ceremony-is-not-open-to-the-press-This-is-the-truth-about-Obama-from-a-REAL-liberal.aspx
Now, here is the truth about the Tea Party you won't hear:
I am not a republican or democrat. I just want to share with people that I was an activist very involved with different causes and groups during the 2005-2008 years when we were protesting Bush and his wars and attacks on our freedom. I remember those days. I remember I once called myself a democrat when I was younger, but I left the democratic party and became neutral. For a while I thought I was a conservative who believed in that too, so you could say I have switched sides and tried them both out. As I got older and studied politics, I became an activist for a while and realized there is no difference between the two parties. At least no different for the issues that are important to me, like the economy, foreign policy, war, corporate oversight, election reform, whistle blower protection, pre-emptive war, indefinite detention without trial, indefinite detention without charge, etc, but that is for another discussion some other time. I plan on exploring this left/right paradigm in my film The Mad Divide (TheMadDivide.com)
Anyway, I just wanted to make clear that I watched the Tea Party come alive from its early days to its decapitation. I believe in willful regard for the truth, at least the truth as I see it. In all honesty and fairness, those who hate the tea party need to understand this fundamental truth about its short lived history.
First of all, we all know that the TEA Party is doing things that a lot of us don't agree with, but they should be taken seriously and not called names or ignored. Engage these people, just as someone on the left should be engaged in dialogue with people on the Right who don't agree with them. It is a matter of self-respect more than it is a matter of respecting them. You don't have to agree with their politics, but you should be able to talk to them and through the discussion, it will become self-evident that there is an underlying truth that may or may not be noticed by both parties in the conversation. Usually, if discussion is embraced with empathetical focus, one side will see the others points and a lot was accomplished. Noam Chomsky even asks people to take the Tea Party serious. Take a look at this article:
http://newworldorderreport.com/News/tabid/266/ID/3143/Chomsky-Urges-UW-Madison-Crowd-to-take-Tea-Party-Movement-Seriously.aspx
Another thing to consider is that Ron Paul was originally a Libertarian presidential candidate but because they don't invite 3rd parties to debates, even if they have a majority support, he realized he needed to become a "Republican" to get any chance of having issues be represented, rather than controlled as they historically have been. That strategy worked. He got Republicans within the party to start supporting an anti-war agenda, which goes against everything the Neo-conservatives had accomplished.
Libertarians have made it very clear to people in the Tea Party to be careful because the modern day Tea Party does not reflect the Libertarian platform, so it was no surprise to see them declare their association with the Tea Party officially over:
http://newworldorderreport.com/News/tabid/266/ID/5381/Libertarians-issue-warning-to-Tea-Partiers.aspx
The Koch brothers were the primary organizers of what we now call the tea party, HOWEVER, there was once a REAL grass roots organizing that started during America: Freedom to Fascism days when Aaron Russo was alive. He was touring the country and talking about doing a movie about 9/11 and then died. Shortly after, Ron Paul started speaking up more. Both Ron Paul and Aaron Russo were Libertarian Party presidential candidates. Then Ron Paul announced he would run and grass roots groups sprang up like wildfires. The time frame I am discussing here is between 2005-2007 when it all started to build.
The truth is, Ron Paul was so successful that activists started merging info about the Federal Reserve and 9/11 and Alex Jones documentaries. This was way before it was called the tea party. Then Ron Paul was not invited to debates anymore and broke away, created a REAL shift in the neo-conservative movement and held his own damn convention. DOES ANYONE REMEMBER THIS REALITY? Jesse Ventura spoke at this convention. This was LONG BEFORE the "tea party" was created.
Then when Obama got in office, people like Glenn Beck who were attacking all of the people who had split the republicans up to that point were now claiming to be on board. Glenn Beck and even Sarah Palin, two NEO-CONSERVATIVES who were NEVER apart of this whole damn revolution, TOOK it over and called it the tea party, and FOX News started co-opting the whole god damn thing. Since then its been down hill bullshit.
That is about the shortest version of the story I can give.
Bare in mind that the majority of protests about the Federal Reserve Bank, the Federal Income Tax and even the Tax day protests have all been taking place for years, even years before 9/11. With that said, a Ron Paul meet-up chapter out in Boston organized a 9/11 truth event called the "Tea Party," believe it or not, and actually threw a bunch of 9/11 Commission Report books into the sea as part of an effort to get people to see the questions about 9/11 that went unanswered. That was the first time anyone in the activist community ever used the phrase "Tea Party." Now, some are split about its impact. Most people who have been protesting the banks and taxes no that those protests and Ron Paul support networks were all in place years before this truther event happened, however, most of those people were also protesting already and recruiting people to the cause of the anti-banking anti-taxing movement. So the truther event known as a "Tea Party" didn't recruit a lot of people to the 9/11 cause, and even most 9/11 activists will tell you that they have also never heard of that event.
As the protests started to get more and more momentum, people were starting to coin the phrase, "Tea Party," as part of their efforts. It wasn't until the election year that FOX News started branding all these random groups with that label. Unlike what many people will tell you on the left, unfortunately, the TEA Party was in deed a grass roots movement for a long time, it was just never called a TEA Party and it used to be dedicated to ending the Federal Income Tax and fighting the Federal Reserve Bank. There is no doubt about this. The problem is, once it was all labeled a "Tea Party" and they started organizing centralized events through FOX News and the Republican leaders, it was officially co-opted and changed, almost immediately, into a neo-conservative effort to retake the lost support Ron Paul caused them. Well, it worked.
The "tea party" as we know it today started during the campaign year for president because of the success Ron Paul got in breaking Republicans away from the party base, so the Republicans, through FOX News, needed to co-opt and take control of the fallen support before and after Obama got in office. The modern day Tea Party as you know it now was created by Koch brothers and Beck, Palin. Mainly a bunch of bullshit neo-cons co-opting everything the liberty bound constitutionalists were doing to make real change. I watched it go down, all of it.
What is sad is that I attended the Bush protests and anti-war protests with the people who now call themselves "tea party" people, not all, some realized it is now all neo-cons and left. I hated Bush's wars and his attacks on our liberty.
That is the truth. We protested like you wouldn't believe and there was NEVER any media that covered us, EVER. We protested the Federal Reserve, the Iraq War, The War on Terror, etc. There were green party people, libertarians, constitutionalists, we the people party and tons more. We were not republicans, we were not democrats. we were Americans.
When Obama got in, he continued the patriot act, he continued the wars, he sent more troops, he didn't close Guantanamo, he continued the use of indefinite detention and torture, he continued the suspension of our constitutional rights. He was Bush version 2.0 for all the hardcore liberals I knew, we all hated what he was doing. We continued to protest, only this time, Mass groves of republicans started showing up. I guess they figured that since we were protesting and Obama was president, we must be in the same demographic as them. The problem is, we weren't. They were neo-cons, many of which were racists, who showed up and ruined everything.
The media though, for the first time EVER, finally showed the protests, only this time, said this was all because of Obama. The media manufactured this link between our anti-war, pro-liberty protests which started under Bush and they linked that with racist neo-cons. How did they do that? Well Glenn Beck and Sarah Palin and Sean Hannity who all attacked us and called us terrorists when we protest Bush, now claimed to be our allies. FOX news was everywhere to be found. Almost as if they wanted to put the spotlight on us in a certain fashion with an effort to ruin everything by linking us with racists. It worked. The Koch brothers funded mass campaigns and it all went downhill.
Michelle Bachman is considered one of the leader's of the modern day Tea Party. She doesn't reflect anything the Tea Party used to represent. For example, she is supporting taxing single mothers higher rates because she thinks this will somehow encourage family growth. So wait a second, she joined an anti-tax movement because of taxes being used to oppress people's liberty and she is proposing using the government to become a force of tyranny on people's personal finances because they weren't fortunate enough to have a family? What a traitor and opportunist she is for taking advantage or people on the right who think she is for the constitution when really she is for big government oppression through taxing. Don't believe me? Have a look for yourself and read this:
http://www.newworldorderreport.com/Default.aspx?tabid=266&ID=7423
Real libertarians who attend these Tea Party events and start protesting or making an effort to point out it is all neo-cons lying to people get attacked by the Tea Party and kicked out. Have a look at this:
http://www.newworldorderreport.com/News/tabid/266/ArticleType/ArticleView/ArticleID/2808/Default.aspx
Even the ORIGINAL founder of this so called "Tea Party" has come out saying that Glenn Beck and Sarah Palin are a joke and that the neo-cons were sent in to take over their efforts:
http://www.newworldorderreport.com/News/tabid/266/ArticleType/ArticleView/ArticleID/5835/Default.aspx
Even Ron Paul, who the Tea Party praises as its godfather of the movement has come out and Ron Paul is now saying that the Tea Party and even Sarah Palin and Glenn Beck are liars. Ron Paul has warned the Tea Party followers not to continue to be had, but are they listening. See for yourself:
http://www.newworldorderreport.com/News/tabid/266/ArticleType/ArticleView/ArticleID/5184/Default.aspx
I saw it early on, that's why I stopped attending the protests, because within the 1st month or 2 of Obama's administration I realized the democrats stopped protesting the wars with us and the only activists out there with us were haters of Obama and that pissed me off.
It pissed me off that democrats went to sleep. It pissed me off that democrats, stuck in their own paradigms too, didn't realize what was taking place. Republicans and the establishment were essentially co-opting the whole revolution to destroy it. It worked. Keith Olbermann and Rachel Maddow, even Jon Stewart called all the protesters racists and that was it, you could never protest about our liberty again. Our freedoms were stolen under Bush, they were stolen under Obama. You can never protest about that without someone thinking you are a racist for some reason. Brilliant work by the corporate establishment, and FOX News. Their plan worked.
Now I feel the need to tell people what I observed. I haven't been in the activist seen in an active sense for a year now because I retired to the internet and my film projects I want to get done. I am focusing on my websites. But i wanted to tell everyone, I wanted to tell the fake tea party neo-cons who think they know what all that is and how it started and I wanted to tell all the democrats who think all those protests started when Obama got in office. The truth is, you are both wrong.
Cindy Sheehan, a friend and fellow activist of mine, was interviewed in my upcoming film about this left/right divide called TheMadDivide.com stated that the anti-war protests are over. The democrats went to sleep. Everyone I interviewed for this film are activists and leaders of the REAL revolution, we have been protesting for years, before Obama. We are against the war, we are not racist. We want our freedom back. Our voice hasn't been heard. This advanced, propaganda, public relations show put on in the last years has been so effective that people I used to respect, intellectuals I used to believe got it are now falling for this bullshit.
To all of you, I hope you watch my film, The Mad Divide. I will expose the left/right paradigm, the media and the real issues. I will show you the activist community and the struggle for those of us who hate corporations AND government tyranny. They both work together and they both co-opt the efforts of our cause. Don't fall for it, I beg of you.
I hope this was insightful and I wish peace upon you and others.
-Jonathan Elinoff
NewWorldOrderReport.com
TheMadDivide.com
CoreOfCorruption.com